Re: [新聞] 嫌房價高一輩子不買?市場血淋淋的真相:房東們就是不想租屋給老人
看板home-sale (房屋交易)作者cpz (我是閃亮亮的鑽石)時間8年前 (2016/10/30 23:08)推噓32(37推 5噓 29→)留言71則, 22人參與討論串10/26 (看更多)
推
10/30 22:50,
10/30 22:50
→
10/30 22:50,
10/30 22:50
**************************************
請問你是神嗎?
這種連華爾街分析師都做不到的事,PTT大師竟然可以做得到,
該去華爾街上班惹。
還有你知道利率是資金供需的價格,這點57楊世光常提,XD
台灣嚴重超愛存錢,我看會跟日本一樣長期低利率。
→
10/30 22:50,
10/30 22:50
是齁,國泰和富邦等壽險公司快點出清八,
PTT趨勢大師們開釋惹,QQ
--
人生天地,勢積必損,財聚必散,年少反衰,樂極反悲。此人之常情也。
故一盛一衰,或得或失,榮枯進退,難逃此理,
經云:人雖靈於萬物,命莫逃乎五行。斯言盡矣。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.165.101.119
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1477840125.A.569.html
推
10/30 23:12, , 1F
10/30 23:12, 1F
推
10/30 23:17, , 2F
10/30 23:17, 2F
推
10/30 23:19, , 3F
10/30 23:19, 3F
推
10/30 23:24, , 4F
10/30 23:24, 4F
推
10/30 23:26, , 5F
10/30 23:26, 5F
推
10/30 23:30, , 6F
10/30 23:30, 6F
→
10/30 23:30, , 7F
10/30 23:30, 7F
→
10/30 23:33, , 8F
10/30 23:33, 8F
推
10/30 23:45, , 9F
10/30 23:45, 9F
推
10/30 23:48, , 10F
10/30 23:48, 10F
→
10/30 23:53, , 11F
10/30 23:53, 11F
→
10/30 23:53, , 12F
10/30 23:53, 12F
推
10/30 23:54, , 13F
10/30 23:54, 13F
推
10/30 23:55, , 14F
10/30 23:55, 14F
推
10/31 00:04, , 15F
10/31 00:04, 15F
推
10/31 00:04, , 16F
10/31 00:04, 16F
推
10/31 00:07, , 17F
10/31 00:07, 17F
推
10/31 00:08, , 18F
10/31 00:08, 18F
→
10/31 00:08, , 19F
10/31 00:08, 19F
推
10/31 00:12, , 20F
10/31 00:12, 20F
→
10/31 00:13, , 21F
10/31 00:13, 21F
→
10/31 00:15, , 22F
10/31 00:15, 22F
台灣有什麼因素引導資金?
馬政府最大的問題就是引惹一堆資金回來,卻沒有引導資金的去向,
這樣資金就供給過剩,利率低就很正常不是嗎?
除非蔡政府有更好的投資方向,
引導資金到該去的地方,讓資金不再供給過剩,
前提是投資和風險的比率,能讓實業家接受。
推
10/31 00:18, , 23F
10/31 00:18, 23F
→
10/31 00:18, , 24F
10/31 00:18, 24F
看板上那篇日本富二代的文章惹嗎? 稅制不同差很多
※ 編輯: cpz (1.165.101.119), 10/31/2016 00:23:04
推
10/31 00:20, , 25F
10/31 00:20, 25F
→
10/31 00:20, , 26F
10/31 00:20, 26F
推
10/31 00:22, , 27F
10/31 00:22, 27F
→
10/31 00:22, , 28F
10/31 00:22, 28F
→
10/31 00:22, , 29F
10/31 00:22, 29F
推
10/31 00:26, , 30F
10/31 00:26, 30F
→
10/31 00:27, , 31F
10/31 00:27, 31F
我沒說楊世光說的都對,但是他有分析師執照,
請問你有嗎?
雖說沒啥了不起,但是要有這張也需要念書不是嗎?
※ 編輯: cpz (1.165.101.119), 10/31/2016 00:28:51
推
10/31 00:31, , 32F
10/31 00:31, 32F
→
10/31 00:31, , 33F
10/31 00:31, 33F
→
10/31 00:31, , 34F
10/31 00:31, 34F
→
10/31 00:32, , 35F
10/31 00:32, 35F
推
10/31 00:36, , 36F
10/31 00:36, 36F
→
10/31 00:36, , 37F
10/31 00:36, 37F
推
10/31 00:42, , 38F
10/31 00:42, 38F
推
10/31 00:45, , 39F
10/31 00:45, 39F
你把結果和手段搞錯惹,資金過剩是結果,升息是手段,
因為沒人投資沒人消費,所以不升息,
如果投資過熱,所以才升息,
這些都是指手段,
結果是降息也沒人投資沒人消費,所以資金越來越多,這是果,
邏輯是這樣der
如果沒人消費沒人投資,硬要升息的話,
大家只會更加拼命存錢減少投資和消費,這樣經濟只會越來越糟...
希望你能了解完整的邏輯概念...
推
10/31 00:45, , 40F
10/31 00:45, 40F
→
10/31 00:45, , 41F
10/31 00:45, 41F
→
10/31 00:45, , 42F
10/31 00:45, 42F
→
10/31 00:46, , 43F
10/31 00:46, 43F
→
10/31 00:47, , 44F
10/31 00:47, 44F
推
10/31 00:48, , 45F
10/31 00:48, 45F
推
10/31 00:51, , 46F
10/31 00:51, 46F
→
10/31 00:52, , 47F
10/31 00:52, 47F
推
10/31 00:54, , 48F
10/31 00:54, 48F
→
10/31 00:54, , 49F
10/31 00:54, 49F
※ 編輯: cpz (1.165.101.119), 10/31/2016 01:02:59
推
10/31 01:18, , 50F
10/31 01:18, 50F
推
10/31 07:35, , 51F
10/31 07:35, 51F
→
10/31 07:35, , 52F
10/31 07:35, 52F
噓
10/31 07:35, , 53F
10/31 07:35, 53F
噓
10/31 07:48, , 54F
10/31 07:48, 54F
推
10/31 08:19, , 55F
10/31 08:19, 55F
噓
10/31 10:46, , 56F
10/31 10:46, 56F
→
10/31 10:46, , 57F
10/31 10:46, 57F
噓
10/31 11:00, , 58F
10/31 11:00, 58F
→
10/31 11:03, , 59F
10/31 11:03, 59F
→
10/31 11:03, , 60F
10/31 11:03, 60F
噓
10/31 11:10, , 61F
10/31 11:10, 61F
→
10/31 11:18, , 62F
10/31 11:18, 62F
推
10/31 11:35, , 63F
10/31 11:35, 63F
推
10/31 11:53, , 64F
10/31 11:53, 64F
推
10/31 15:46, , 65F
10/31 15:46, 65F
→
10/31 15:47, , 66F
10/31 15:47, 66F
推
10/31 17:26, , 67F
10/31 17:26, 67F
→
10/31 18:04, , 68F
10/31 18:04, 68F
推
10/31 22:34, , 69F
10/31 22:34, 69F
推
11/01 10:54, , 70F
11/01 10:54, 70F
推
11/03 10:34, , 71F
11/03 10:34, 71F
討論串 (同標題文章)
home-sale 近期熱門文章
PTT職涯區 即時熱門文章