Re: [新聞] 婦搭公車心跳突停 台大生CPR救回一命

看板medstudent (醫學生)作者 (哇哈哈)時間11年前 (2015/06/27 00:53), 編輯推噓0(0020)
留言20則, 2人參與, 最新討論串11/26 (看更多)
※ 引述《miaooooooooo (貓主席小妹)》之銘言: : Willful and wanton conduct means “acting consciously in disregard of or : acting with a reckless indifference to the consequences, when the Defendant : is aware of her conduct and is also aware, from her knowledge of existing : circumstances and conditions, that her conduct would probably result in : injury.” [Duncan v. Duncan (In re Duncan), 448 F.3d 725, 729 (4th Cir. Va. : 2006)] : “A course of action which shows actual or deliberate intention to harm or : which, if not intentional, shows an utter indifference to or conscious : disregard of a person's own safety and the safety of others."[Siemer v. : Nangle (In re Nangle), 274 F.3d 481, 483 (8th Cir. Mo. 2001)] 這兩段為何不翻成中文呢? 以下是網路查到的單字 reckless: 不注意的,大意的,鹵莽的,不顧後果 indifference: 漠不關心 probably: 可能,大概,或許 utter: 全然的,絕對,完全 除了第二段前面的故意(有意使其發生)之外,其他好像不少是過失的範疇... 最恐怖的是"from her knowledge of existing circumstances and conditions"這句, 上了法庭法官對於醫護應該知道的knowledge期望可能會高於一般民眾, 而且很多急救措施都是"probably result in injury" 更不用說是否reckless indifference恐怕是要由法官來心證... -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.192.164.117 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/medstudent/M.1435337619.A.92F.html

06/27 00:56, , 1F
關鍵是只要"容有爭議",路倒病人或家屬提告就不太會成立誣
06/27 00:56, 1F

06/27 00:57, , 2F
告罪,只要少數檢察官會起訴,多再議幾次可能就會遇到...
06/27 00:57, 2F

06/27 00:58, , 3F
當然念過法律明確了解風險還願意施救的我們應該給掌聲
06/27 00:58, 3F

06/27 16:48, , 4F
大哥,我不敢翻成中文,就是因為這些都是法律名詞
06/27 16:48, 4F

06/27 16:48, , 5F
直接翻譯反而是誤導鄉民
06/27 16:48, 5F

06/27 16:50, , 6F
用這個吧。連法律上如何解釋解釋都有說明
06/27 16:50, 6F

06/27 16:50, , 7F

06/27 16:51, , 8F
Reckless conduct is a totally unreasonable condu
06/27 16:51, 8F

06/27 16:51, , 9F
uct that is a gross deviation from what a reason
06/27 16:51, 9F

06/27 16:52, , 10F
sonable person would do
06/27 16:52, 10F

06/27 16:53, , 11F
Indifference to rRisk is defined as that which c
06/27 16:53, 11F

06/27 16:53, , 12F
consciously disregards a substantial and unjusti
06/27 16:53, 12F

06/27 16:53, , 13F
fiable risk that the material element exists or
06/27 16:53, 13F

06/27 16:53, , 14F
will result, and involves a gross deviation fro
06/27 16:53, 14F

06/27 16:53, , 15F
m the standard of conduct that a law-abiding per
06/27 16:53, 15F

06/27 16:53, , 16F
rson would observe in the actor's situation.
06/27 16:53, 16F

06/27 16:54, , 17F
概念上跟過失已經全然不同了。
06/27 16:54, 17F

06/27 16:56, , 18F
這兩個條件也常常是美國醫師要被判刑的條件,若是
06/27 16:56, 18F

06/27 16:56, , 19F
這兩個條件留的後門大家還是不能接受的話,那麼我想
06/27 16:56, 19F

06/27 16:57, , 20F
即使我們跟美國都醫療去刑化了,各位也是不滿意吧
06/27 16:57, 20F
文章代碼(AID): #1LZOEJal (medstudent)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1LZOEJal (medstudent)