[英中] 請問這段要怎樣修改才順暢才沒有錯

看板Translation (筆譯/翻譯)作者lindalo (愛玩電腦遊戲的阿姨)時間14年前 (2011/02/15 11:26)推噓0(0推 0噓 2→)

留言2則, 1人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)

Peter McLaren: Yes, that would be a very fair description. I am not alone,clearly, in this struggle. There are others within universities who work internationally toward the same goal. But it is also fair to say that in the United States there are very few of us in the field of education and the future in this regard looks irrepressibly bleak. Well, let me put it thisway. To their ongoing credit, there are those who are quite capable of engaging in a rigorous analysis of mounting sophisticated and nuanced attacks on the scoundrels and hypocrites of the Bush administration, the gangster capitalists and political opportunists, the feckless cabal of Christian-right "profamily activists" who exercise their racism by warning about the coming "demographic winter" facing the United States unless the white population produce enough babies to achieve "replacement-level fertility," and on the evangelical economic zealots who call out for a renewed assault on the poor through neoliberal economic, political, and social directives and principles. But these critics of the wretched havoc wrought by neoliberalism do not at the same time identify an alternative-at least one that is couched beyond very safe and I would say largely empty liberal pluralist principles. Untilabout the mid-1990s, I found myself in the same dilemma. For me, the struggle was focused on democratizing the public sphere. But since that time I have been a staunch advocate of education as a means to further socialism, that is, to bring about a world outside capital's valorization process or, put another way, outside labor's value form. I have described capitalism and democracy as two thieves planning a joint robbery and simultaneously attempting to steal the spoils from each other. Peter Mclaren:是的，這個描述沒有錯。在這場鬥爭中顯然我並非單打獨鬥，在其他大學裡有其他人在國際上努力朝同一個目標前進。但事實上在美國的教育界中我們的確是少數，這一點在未來也很難有改變。嗯，我換個方式說吧，一些土匪似的資本主義者以及投機政客，為了讓他們的貸款制度能不斷發展下去，連合主張『家庭優先主義』的基督教右派人士，他們為了實現種族主義這個不中用的陰謀而警告美國將會面臨『人口減少』問題，要是白種人嬰兒的出生率達不到淘汰等級的繁殖力，然而這群人有能力對蠻橫偽善的布希政府和堅持黨派觀念的狂熱福音派人士透過新民主主義的政、經、社會方針原則，重新發動對窮人的攻擊做嚴謹的分析並發出完善有意義的抨擊。不過這些評論家，在批評新民主主義卑劣精緻的手段所造成的大混亂之時並沒有同時提出替代方案，至少提出一個相對之下保險一點的論述，總而言之我將會指出自由派提出多元論國家學說的人空洞的資本。大約到90年代中期，我發現自己面臨同樣的難題。對我來說，鬥爭針對的是官場體系的民主化。但自那時開始我就堅決的主張以教育的方式，再推動社會主義，要實現一個在資本主導下的穩定物價措施以及勞工價格體制之外的社會。我會將資本主義和民主形容成兩個盤算著互相搶劫同時企圖對方竊取贓物的賊。 P.S.之前要請教時沒看版規而遭版主大刀刪除，無奈只好再發一次，原本是想藏拙的，而且實在是能力有限，寫不順暢，又怕誤解原文，厚著臉皮按照版規附上自己的。請眾家高手指點，並學習，謝謝。後面兩段覺得寫很爛也不確定正不正確，請指教，謝謝，至於原文本來就是那樣，因為有人說要分段，我就大致上把沒把握的分出兩段。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.132.198.73